Evaluation Metrics for Regression Models in Machine Learning

When working on a regression-based learning model, one of the most important jobs is selecting the proper assessment metric. The best regression assessment metrics are also known as loss functions.  Typically, more than one measure …

regression model metrics

When working on a regression-based learning model, one of the most important jobs is selecting the proper assessment metric. The best regression assessment metrics are also known as loss functions. 

Typically, more than one measure is necessary to evaluate a machine learning model, so many data and projects exist. There are several regression model metrics used in machine learning. Some examples of crucial regression measures are explained below. 

Mean Absolute Error (MAE): The mean absolute error is calculated by adding all positive and fundamental values. Even though the difference between the anticipated and actual values is negative, the positive value is used in the computation. 

For instance, if the actual value is 200 and the projected value is 250, the error difference is negative. However, the value chosen is positive, the actual value of a mistake. As a result, the mean absolute error can be calculated by dividing the total number of final mistakes by the sum of all fundamental errors.

MAE is beneficial for communicating the anticipated mistake to stakeholders. While MSE is commonly employed as a cost function, MAE has the benefit of being more explicable and having a better link with the “real world.” 

This property makes it easy to determine whether your algorithm is delivering an acceptable error for the business problem you are attempting to address.

Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): While MAE provides a figure that you may review with stakeholders to determine if it is acceptable, the measure never indicates how much “error” is good.

Is a mean absolute error of ten dollars, for example, excessive? Is this acceptable? It is entirely dependent on the size of your target!

Although error acceptance is a statistic connected to project scope, it is helpful to understand how the error deviates from the objective in percentage terms.

The Mean Absolute % Error (MAPE) provides the error term in percentage terms, providing an excellent perspective into the error term in percentage terms.

Because of its nature, MAPE is frequently used in time series issues. This is a remarkable statistic for communicating these issues since you can declare that your projection will differ by x% “on average.”

MAPE may also be used to assess other continuous variable models, albeit this depends on your target’s predicted values – MAPE does not work well with values close to zero.

Mean Squared Error: MSE stands for Mean Squared Error, which is the average of the squared discrepancies between the actual and projected values. The lower the value, the more accurate the regression model.

MSE uses the square operation to eliminate each mistake value’s sign and penalize significant errors. As you square the error, the influence of more significant mistakes becomes more evident than the effect of more minor errors. Thus the model may now focus more on the more significant errors.

This isn’t very useful because if we make a terrible prediction, the squaring will amplify the error and may bias the measure towards overestimating the model’s badness. 

Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE): The average root-squared difference between the actual and predicted values is referred to as the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The Root Mean Square Error is obtained by calculating the square root of MSE.

The RMSE value needs to be as low as possible; the lower the RMSE number, the better the model’s predictions. A higher RMSE implies that the expected and actual values differ significantly.

Leave a Comment